Skip to main content

Originally published Friday, April 10, 2015 at 5:03 AM

  • Share:
  • Comments
  • Print

Class divides are killing the American dream, writes Robert Putnam in ‘Our Kids’

“Our Kids,” the new book by the distinguished social scientist and author Robert Putnam, examines the growing and hardening of class divisions in America and its likely impact on future generations. Putnam appears Thursday, April 16, at Town Hall Seattle.

The Washington Post

Author appearance

Robert Putnam

The author of “Our Kids” will appear at 7:30 p.m. Thursday, April 16, at Town Hall Seattle, 1119 Eighth Ave. Tickets are $5, available at and at the door beginning at 6:30 p.m. Information: 206-652-4255.


In the late 1950s, Robert Putnam, the distinguished social scientist whose “Bowling Alone” (2000) has become one of the most influential books of our time, lost his campaign for the presidency of his high-school class in Port Clinton, Ohio. The victor was one of the few African Americans in the school, a star athlete who, after a stint as a utility worker, eventually rose through the Los Angeles school system to the rank of principal and then regional director. His career represented a considerable accomplishment. But it pales in comparison with that of Putnam, now a professor in public policy at Harvard University.

What determines where different individuals end up in life? And have those determinants changed over time? These are the questions Putnam asks in his new book, “Our Kids” (Simon & Schuster, 386 pp., $28). His answers, documented through portraits of specific people, as well as analyses of data on social and economic mobility, reveal what may be the single greatest scandal of contemporary American life: the extraordinary role that social class has come to play in our patterns of achievement, accompanied by a hardening of class boundaries over the past ­half-century that makes it exceptionally difficult for those from classes below to rise to classes above.

I know about Putnam’s limitations as a high-school politician because his first chapter revisits those years to examine what has happened to Port Clinton over the past half-century. Putnam was fortunate to have been born there because the town was a safe and relatively stress-free place in the 1950s — and because, located in a swing state that often holds the balance of power in presidential elections, it was and is representative of the nation as a whole. We have heard a great deal about the hollowing out of Midwestern cities. Putnam’s treatment of his hometown is especially poignant.

It is more difficult to portray an entire nation rather than one of its smaller parts, and as Putnam moves on, much of the intimacy of the first chapter is lost. He includes vignettes illustrating the lives of real people in places ranging from Bend, Ore., to Atlanta. These vignettes, however, are presented didactically: They are there to make larger points and not because they are especially interesting in themselves. Putnam’s great strength is his ability to explain the meaning of charts and tables in clear language, and the more he focuses on what data rather than people tell us, the better for his book.

It ought to be fairly obvious that children who have parents with deep resources will have more advantages in life than those who do not. Far more important is the emphasis Putnam places on the crisis that awaits us as deprived children grow up and have children of their own. As with global warming, action must be taken now to head off future disruptions, he convincingly argues. But it is impossible to imagine that a political system unable to repair its physical infrastructure will begin paying attention to its social and cultural one.

Even if we had a functioning government, moreover, we would need a frank discussion of the two major fault lines in American life: race and class. To demonstrate the seriousness of the problem we face, Putnam focuses on the early years of a person’s life: the roles that family, schools and neighborhood play in social development. Some children are raised with two biological parents, others with one, and all too many with none. One of the latter, dubbed by Putnam “Elijah,” has had an especially rough life: beaten by his father after the son was jailed for arson, thrown out of the house by his mother because of drinking and drugs, unable to escape the lure of the streets. “Desmond” had a radically different life: His parents moved to get him into a better school, encouraged him to read and were there for him when he was accepted into a good college. Both these young men spent part of their youth in Atlanta; they ended up in radically different places because one had support from elders and the other did not.

“Elijah” and “Desmond” are both black, which seems to take race out of the picture: Being raised by caring parents trumps race in determining achievement. But that is true only at the level of anecdote. Putnam desperately wants to help all children, regardless of their race, to achieve their full capabilities. But as he documents the negative role that neglect plays in very early child development, one cannot help thinking that poor black children raised in urban ghettos face obstacles more demanding than any other children in America.

Putnam wants reform, but can any realizable reform overcome the depths of the gap between rich and poor, or black and white? He writes at one point that the importance of early child development “does not mean that later interventions are useless, still less that the class-based disparities are God-given or predetermined, but it does suggest the importance of focusing on early child development.”

But, one wants to respond, either early child development is determinative or it is not. If it is, later intervention, as right-wing observers such as Charles Murray will quickly point out, will hardly ever work. If it is not, class and racial disparities are less deep than Putnam suggests. Read Putnam’s prose, and the message is hopeful. Read his data, and it is the opposite.

I doubt that “Our Kids” will have the same impact as “Bowling Alone.” But it should. For all its flaws, Putman’s new book is an eye-opener. When serious political candidates maintain that there are no classes in America, Putnam shows us the reality — and it is anything but reassuring.

Alan Wolfe teaches political science at Boston College and is the author of “At Home in Exile: Why Diaspora Is Good for the Jews.”

Four weeks for 99 cents of unlimited digital access to The Seattle Times. Try it now!

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

 Subscribe today!

Subscribe today!

99¢ for four weeks of unlimited digital access.



The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►
The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription upgrade.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. For unlimited access, please upgrade your digital subscription.

Call customer service at 1.800.542.0820 for assistance with your upgrade or questions about your subscriber status.

The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. Subscribe now for unlimited access!

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited content access is included with most subscriptions.

Activate Subscriber Account ►