|Your account||Today's news index||Weather||Traffic||Movies||Restaurants||Today's events|
Friday, June 25, 2004 - Page updated at 12:00 A.M.
Wal-Mart lawsuit puts focus on narrowing pay inequity
By Amy Joyce
The finding that there was enough information to show that women at Wal-Mart were paid less than male counterparts in equal positions has put pay inequity back in the forefront of workplace issues. Female employees today earn an average of 77 percent of what their male co-workers do, up from 59 percent 40 years ago, according to the U.S. census.
Although many companies do track pay inequities, the case could force employers to put equal-pay rules on a faster track. If a pattern of pay disparities appears to exist, companies are now reminded by the Wal-Mart case that they could become embroiled in a messy, long battle or pricey settlement.
"I think this is going to be the fuse that ignites the compensation analysis that we've never seen before," said John Fox, chairman of the employment and labor-law group with the law firm Fenwick & West in Mountain View, Calif.
Tuesday's ruling could include as many as 1.6 million current and former female Wal-Mart employees, making it the largest private-employer civil-rights case in U.S. history.
Wal-Mart lawyers had argued to the judge that statistical differences in pay and positions were due to differing job aspirations and interests between men and women that exist in the general labor force, and that can't be blamed on the company.
That has been one argument used for years to explain the wage gap.
But according to a new study by Catalyst, a women's research organization, 55 percent of women and 57 percent of men want to occupy the most senior role within an organization. In addition, women who have children living with them are just as likely to want to occupy a higher position as those without children at home, the study found.
Even though more women are taking on better-paying occupations, the pay still isn't equal, Department of Labor statistics show.
For instance, 15 years ago more than half of all full-time accountants and auditors were men. Today, there are 561,000 male accountants and 784,000 women. Yet male accountants earn $1,041 on average per week, while female accountants make an average of $756 per week.
There were 6,037 wage-discrimination-charge filings with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in fiscal 2003, which accounted for 7.5 percent of the EEOC's total private-sector cases. The number of wage filings has remained the same over the past decade, according to a spokesman.
That gap has narrowed slightly but steadily during the past 20 years. In 1993 women earned 71.4 percent of what men earned, and in 1983 it was 66.7 percent.
"This (gap) is narrowing quite slowly," said Jane Smith, chief executive of Business and Professional Women/USA. "It will be another 50 years before we see it disappear if it goes at the rate it's going."
Although Wal-Mart's reputation is "not to bend to litigation," no matter what happens with the case, the effects will be felt across the workplace landscape, according to Arisa Lieberwitz, associate professor of labor law at Cornell University's School of Industrial and Labor Relations.
"Because Wal-Mart's so big, so enormous, so powerful. ... where there is a large lawsuit, people pay attention," she said. "It may be that women elsewhere can use this as a vehicle for trying to improve their situation in their own workplace."
Copyright © 2004 The Seattle Times Company
Home delivery | Contact us | Search archive | Site map | Low-graphic
NWclassifieds | NWsource | Advertising info | The Seattle Times Company
Back to top