The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds |

Business / Technology

Our network sites | Advanced

Originally published May 1, 2010 at 5:03 PM | Page modified May 1, 2010 at 9:25 PM

Comments (0)     E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

Fabulous Fab shows managers still 'oblivious' to e-mail peril

Corporate history is filled with instances of employees sending e-mails — and coming to regret it.

Bloomberg News

E-mail trails

SOME OF the more infamous statements that came back to haunt corporate figures and companies:

Merrill Lynch analyst Henry Blodget

Concerning InfoSpace in July 2000: "This stock is a powder keg, given how aggressive we were on it earlier this year and given the "bad smell" comments that so many institutions are bringing up."

Concerning Lifeminders in December 2000: "I can't believe what a POS [ piece of — ] that thing is. Shame on me/us for giving them any benefit of the doubt."

To Blodget from Merrill VP Kirsten Campbell concerning AltaVista in November 2000: "We are losing people and money and I don't like it. John and Mary Smith are losing their retirement because we don't want Todd to be mad at us. The whole idea that we are independent from banking is a big lie."

Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein

Discussed how to "arm" salespeople to shed bonds the firm found too risky to hold in February 2007:

"Could/should we have cleaned up these books before and are we doing enough right now to sell off cats and dogs in other books throughout the division."

A.H. Robins Co.

One low-level A.H. Robins employee to a company executive discussing the side effects of the drug Fen-phen: "Do I have to look forward to spending my waning years writing checks to fat people worried about a silly lung problem?"

JP Morgan Chase: An internal e-mail chain at JPMorgan Chase that described secret loans called a "prepay" in fall 2001: "Enron loves these deals as they are able to hide funded debt from their equity analysts because they (at the very least) book it as deferred [revenue] or (better yet) bury it in their trading liabilities."

Another internal e-mail expressed concern: "Five [billion] in prepays!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

The reply to that e-mail proved even more damaging: "Shut up and delete this e-mail."

Goldman Sachs Chief Financial Officer David Viniar:

"There will be very good opportunities as the markets goes into what is likely to be even greater distress and we want to be in position to take advantage of them."

Goldman Sachs' Fabrice Tourre:

"The whole building is about to collapse anytime now. Only potential survivor, the 'Fabulous Fab.' "

In a January 2007 e-mail to a friend, Tourre described "all these complex, highly leveraged exotic trades" that he created "without necessarily understanding all the implications of those monstruosities!!!"

He also referred to derivatives as "intellectual masturbation" and likened a CDO he put together to a "little Frankenstein turning against his own inventor."


While Fabrice Tourre may have found himself fabulous when devising intricate transactions and presuming he survived their collapses, the e-mail trail he left behind was a less-than-marvelous repetition of history.

E-mails from the Goldman Sachs Group director are the center of the case saying the firm misled investors into a mortgage-linked investment.

In one he wrote, "The whole building is about to collapse anytime now," according to the complaint. "Only potential survivor, the fabulous Fab."

His messages left lawyers asking: What was he thinking?

"It is shocking how people are oblivious to the fact that e-mails are a treasure trove for lawyers," said Jacob Frenkel, a partner at Shulman Rogers Gandal Pordy & Eckerin in Potomac, Md. "It's a combination of not thinking, ignorance and arrogance."

Corporate history is filled with instances of employees sending e-mails — and coming to regret it.

American Home Products, a predecessor of what is now Pfizer's Wyeth unit, was forced to set aside billions to pay to dieters who suffered heart-valve damage and a fatal lung disease as a result of taking its diet pills.

In some of the cases, the plaintiffs' lawyers produced an American Home memo that they said characterized the company's callous attitude toward the health problems.

"Do I have to look forward to spending my waning years writing checks to fat people worried about a silly lung problem?" said the e-mail from a low-level American Home official to one of the company's executives.

Silicon Valley investment banker Frank Quattrone was charged in 2003 by federal prosecutors with obstructing justice after he wrote an e-mail that prosecutors said strongly advised bankers to destroy underwriting records. He was convicted in 2004 and sentenced to 18 months in prison.

"Having been a key witness in a securities litigation case in south texas (miniscribe) i strongly advise you to follow these procedures," Quattrone wrote in the e-mail to his team, referring to company procedures to discard internal memos and nonessential records. Miniscribe was a client that had been the subject of litigation.

Two years later, Quattrone won his appeal, authorities dropped both cases and he avoided jail.

Two Bear Stearns hedge-fund managers were indicted in 2008, with the evidence including e-mails that prosecutors said showed the men touting funds while bemoaning their failure privately. They were acquitted in 2009.

Tourre, 31, is accused of misleading an investor, ACA Management, into thinking a hedge fund planned to invest in the equity of the deal instead of betting against it. He is denying the allegations. Pamela Chepiga, his lawyer at Allen & Overy in New York, didn't immediately return a call.

In a January 2007 e-mail to a friend, he described "all these complex, highly leveraged exotic trades" that he created "without necessarily understanding all the implications of those monstruosities!!!"

In a March 7, 2007, e-mail released by the firm, Tourre described the U.S. subprime-mortgage market as "not too brilliant" and said that "according to Sparks," an apparent reference to Daniel Sparks who ran Goldman Sachs's mortgage business at the time, "that business is totally dead, and the poor little subprime borrowers will not last too long!!!"

E-mails help prosecutors because they show "the intent or mindset of someone," said Charles Parker, head of securities practice at Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell in Houston. Before e- mails, prosecutors lacked such insights, he said.

"Once a judge admits one of these e-mails into evidence, the company knows it's in trouble," he said. "The jury will latch onto these things and remember 'em when it comes time to deliberate."

Many executives prefer e-mail over a phone call because it's faster and easier, said Marc Hirschfeld, founder of Precision Legal Services, a Washington, D.C.-based company that helps law firms gather and produce their clients' e-mails and electronic communication.

Many don't realize an e-mail leaves a trail, said Hirschfeld, a former litigation attorney.

"People use e-mail as they used telephones about 10 or 15 years ago," he said. "They become more susceptible to saying things that are inappropriate. They feel that it's not going to come up in talk ever again and what they don't realize, is that there's a permanent record."

Innocuous e-mails, such as jokes, can prove to be harmful later on, especially if used as evidence, Hirschfeld said.

"That joke can be taken so far out of context, especially in legal proceedings when lawyers get their hands on it," he said. "People also use terms that sound criminal, but they have no intention of meaning it."

A newer risk is text messages, which are also used increasingly for business purposes, he said.

Mishaps with e-mails aren't confined to business executives. Private e-mails from scientists debating climate change were stolen and posted on the Internet in November. The e-mails showed researchers musing that they may withhold data from critics seeking to discredit their work.

Skeptics of man's contribution to global warming cited the e-mails as evidence of a conspiracy to manipulate findings about climate change.

"You would think that with the high-profile cases of the past few years, where e-mails have been the source of great embarrassment, or worse, for high-profile companies and individuals, by now people would have learned," Frenkel said.

At a hearing over the Goldman Sachs case, Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., asked what Chief Financial Officer David Viniar felt when he read e-mails in which the bank's employees described mortgage-linked securities as "crap" or worse.

"I think that's very unfortunate to have on e-mail," Viniar said, drawing laughter from the audience and the news media.

"Please don't take that the wrong way," Viniar said when pressed by Levin. "I think that's very unfortunate for anyone to have said that in any form."

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

More Business & Technology

UPDATE - 09:46 AM
Exxon Mobil wins ruling in Alaska oil spill case

UPDATE - 09:32 AM
Bank stocks push indexes higher; oil prices dip

UPDATE - 08:04 AM
Ford CEO Mulally gets $56.5M in stock award

UPDATE - 07:54 AM
Underwater mortgages rise as home prices fall

NEW - 09:43 AM
Warner Bros. to offer movie rentals on Facebook

More Business & Technology headlines...

No comments have been posted to this article.

Get home delivery today!



AP Video

Entertainment | Top Video | World | Offbeat Video | Sci-Tech