Housing foreclosures still profitable for investors
While still smaller when compared to the heyday of the mortgage-backed securities market before the financial crisis, demand is expected to grow as institutional investors search for yield and analysts estimate that there are still billions worth of delinquent mortgages in the U.S.
The New York Times
Rises in housing prices have been profitable to private equity firms and institutional investors that bought foreclosed homes to flip them or to rent them out. Now the recovery in housing is fueling a niche market for newly minted bonds that are backed by the most troubled mortgages of them all: those on homes on the verge of foreclosure.
And it is not just vulture hedge funds swooping in to try to profit from the last remnants of the housing crisis. The investors making money off these obscure bonds — none is rated by a major credit-rating agency — include American mutual funds. And one of the biggest sellers of severely delinquent mortgages to investors is a U.S. government housing agency.
The demand for securitizations of nonperforming loans illustrates Wall Street’s never-ending hunt for higher-yielding investment opportunities. The market also reflects, in part, an effort by regulators to close a chapter on the housing mess.
For mutual funds and other institutional investors, the appeal of these bonds is obvious. They have yields of about 4 percent and pay out quickly — often in just two years — if the foreclosure process on the loans in the portfolio goes smoothly. The yields look enticing compared with the current 2.42 percent yield on a 10-year Treasury note.
So far this year, there have been 28 deals backed by $7 billion worth of nonperforming loans sold to investors, according to Intex Solutions, a structured finance cash-flow modeling firm. Last year, Intex said, there were 72 deals backed by $11.6 billion worth of nonperforming loans.
Regulatory records show that over the last two years mutual funds either offered or advised by firms like JPMorgan Chase, SEI Investments, Weitz Investments and Edward Jones have been buying unrated bonds with names like Bayview Opportunity Master Fund IIa Trust NPL, Kondaur Mortgage Asset Trust and Stanwich Mortgage Loan Trust NPL.
The market for these bonds is still small when compared to the heyday of the mortgage-backed securities market before the financial crisis. But the demand is expected to grow as institutional investors search for yield and analysts estimate that there are still some $660 billion worth of delinquent mortgages in the United States. The trade publication Asset Backed Alert recently said that bond deals worth $4 billion to $5 billion were in the works for the second-half of the year.
“These are very short-duration bonds, which really operate as liquidation trusts,” said Ken Shinoda, a mortgage-backed securities portfolio manager with DoubleLine Capital, which has reviewed but not yet invested in unrated bonds of nonperforming loans.
Representatives for some of the mutual funds that have invested in these securities say so far these bonds have paid out as anticipated and the risk of loss is low because their funds’ relative exposures are small.
Carlene Benz, a JPMorgan spokeswoman, said in an emailed response that the bank’s portfolio managers were comfortable investing in these unrated bonds because they have a “short duration yet provide yields higher than many longer duration assets.”
John Boul, a spokesman for Edward Jones, said unrated investments accounted for a small percentage of the firm’s bond funds. He added that the firm’s bond fund was managed by outside advisers, including some at JPMorgan.
For the investment firms, hedge funds and private equity firms buying the distressed mortgages and packaging the bonds, securitization is way to finance their operations and cash in their investments.
The catalyst for the emergence of this unusual market was a decision by the Housing and Urban Development Department to begin selling some of the most severely delinquent mortgages guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration to avoid losses to U.S. taxpayers. Since 2010, HUD has sold 101,290 soured home loans with a combined unpaid balance of $17.6 billion in more than a dozen auctions, and more distressed sales are planned.
Recently, Freddie Mac, the giant mortgage-finance firm that operates under government control, also got into the act when it sold $659 million worth of troubled mortgages. Banks are also sellers of nonperforming mortgages.
Institutional investors are especially drawn to the Housing and Urban Development auctions because these nonperforming loans, which are spread across the U.S., can be purchased for between 60 and 70 cents on the dollar of the unpaid principal. The list of investment firms buying HUD loans include firms affiliated with the Blackstone Group, Oaktree Capital Management, Lone Star Funds, Angelo Gordon & Co., the Kondaur Capital Corp. and Pretium Partners.
The housing agency contends that even if a small percentage of the loans are reworked in a way that avoids a foreclosure or permits a borrower to gracefully exit a mortgage without being burdened with additional debt payments, it’s a good outcome.
Biniam Gebre, a general deputy assistant secretary at HUD, said. “While the primary objective of the note-sale program is to minimize losses to FHA’s insurance fund, and ultimately to taxpayers,” it was also providing “an opportunity for borrowers with no alternatives” to avoid foreclosure.
The agency, he added, has no problem with the private buyers finding ways “to securitize and bring private capital into the mortgage market” as long as it doesn’t detract from the program’s goals.
Before the end of the summer, the buyers of these HUD loans are supposed to file the first of several periodic reports outlining their ability to either rework the mortgages or foreclose on the properties. Representatives for several investment firms declined to discuss their performance figures before the reports are submitted to HUD.
Some firms that have sold bonds backed by nonperforming loans said they were also working on putting together securitizations of once-distressed loans that had been reworked or made to be “reperforming” in the parlance of Wall Street. Reperforming loans are ones in which the overall debt owed by the borrower has been reduced or the monthly payment cut to a level the homeowner can afford. Some of these reworked loans have been included in a number of the nonperforming loan deals as well.
But a review of some of the early pools of delinquent loans bought by the investment firms from HUD suggests that the percentage of reworked loans is likely to be small.
Still, rating agencies, which are largely reluctant to get involved in reviewing nonperforming loan deals, are gearing up to review bonds that are backed by reperforming mortgages. The thinking is that as the economy and housing markets continue to improve, the ability of delinquent homeowners to start making payments on a more affordable mortgage will rise.
In anticipation of a new wave of securitizations, Fitch Ratings, just lastlast week, published a proposal for its criteria for rating mortgage securities backed by reperforming loans. It has asked players in the market to provide feedback on its proposal by mid-September.
“The absence of a rating hasn’t been an obstacle to these deals so far,” said Michele Patterson, a senior director with Kroll Bond Rating Agency, which, like Fitch, has begun reviewing how it might rate reperforming-mortgage deals. She said, some “some issuers may be looking for a rating to diversify their investor base.”