Slingbox has new features for TVs, but is less necessary
Sling has updated its place-shifting technology and put it into its latest model, the Slingbox M1. But is it enough to compete in the ever-changing environment of television viewing?
San Jose Mercury News
Remember Sling, the company that pioneered place-shifting TV? Well, not only is it still around, but it just released a cheaper and more refined Slingbox.
Sling made its mark by giving consumers remote access to the live and recorded video they could get through their pay TV service. Sling users sitting in front of their office PC could watch a live baseball game streamed from their home TV. And those traveling could watch videos recorded on their DVRs on their mobile phones or tablets.
In recent years, Sling has touted the ability of its users to shift content from one TV in their home to another. For example, they can watch shows on the TV in their bedroom without needing to rent another cable box. Instead, they can use the Sling app on their mobile device to beam content from the living room to a low-cost Apple TV or Roku box attached to their bedroom TV.
With the M1, a cigar-box-size device that attaches to a set-top box, Sling hopes to appeal to a broader audience by offering a less expensive, easier-to-use device. At $150, the M1 is $30 cheaper than the model it’s replacing, the Slingbox 350.
Unlike the 350, the M1 has a built-in Wi-Fi antenna, making it much easier to connect to the Internet than the older model. The 350 offered only an Ethernet connection.
Sling has also made the M1 easier to set up than past models. Before, users had to go through a Web browser on their computer to configure a Slingbox. With the M1, they can use the Sling smartphone or tablet apps instead.
Those apps feature another new tweak for the M1. Slingbox users in the past were able to beam video sent from the device to their tablet or smartphone on to their TVs. But they typically couldn’t do anything else with their mobile devices while streaming video.
Now Sling has upgraded the apps to allow users to check their email, see what people are saying on Twitter or head over to IMDb on their smartphone or tablet without interrupting what’s on their TV.
My wife and I don’t have a TV in our bedroom, so we used our iPad instead to watch an episode of “The Colbert Report” streamed from our living room via the M1. The picture quality was great, and it was nice to be able to watch something in bed without having to buy another TV or rent another set-top box.
Similarly, I watched on my iPhone part of an episode of “Agatha Christie’s Poirot” I’d recorded while out walking around my neighborhood. The video quality was only so-so, but acceptable.
Unfortunately, the M1 has some of the same shortcomings as previous Slingbox models. There’s often an annoying second or two delay between pressing a button in the Sling app and seeing a response from your DVR or set-top box. I experienced similar delays both when I was in the house accessing the Slingbox over my home Wi-Fi and when I was connecting with it over cellular networks on my smartphone.
Another shortcoming is that the M1 hijacks the set-top box it’s connected to. Users at home can watch only what’s being sent to the person using the Sling app.
But the biggest shortcoming of M1 is that the problem it’s trying to solve appears to be disappearing. For years, consumers have been able to effectively place-shift TV programming via online video services like Netflix, Hulu, Apple’s iTunes and Amazon Prime Instant Video. Those choices have only improved in recent years. Roku’s box, for example, has some 1,000 channels offering a wide variety of Internet-based content.
More threatening for Sling, the pay TV companies’ latest set-top boxes and apps offer many of the same features users get through a Slingbox. Dish Network, for example, has built Sling’s technology into its Hopper DVR, but has done so in a way that allows users at home and away to watch different programs.
So while I’m happy to see Sling continue to improve its Slingbox lineup and love the new price, I’m not convinced the M1 is anything close to a must-have.