Skip to main content

Originally published November 26, 2012 at 4:04 PM | Page modified November 26, 2012 at 4:04 PM

  • Share:
  • Comments (47)
  • Print

Editorial: Ruling to reinstate pension raises should be reversed

The pension ruling by Judge Chris Wickham of Thurston County Superior Court is wrong and should be overturned.

Seattle Times Editorial

Most Popular Comments
Hide / Show comments
Rulings on points of law should be left to the legal system to resolve, not to... MORE
"Nobody should have ever promised a pension that they new would break the state's... MORE
"DrPezz - Yeah lets balance the budget on the back of hard working taxpayers that... MORE


A Thurston County Superior Court decision to reinstate annual raises for members of two state pension plans should be overturned.

In 2011, the Legislature canceled these raises for all but the lowest-paid beneficiaries in order to balance the state budget. Its action should be sustained.

The pensions are the Public Employees’ Retirement System Plan 1 and the Teachers’ Retirement System Plan 1. They are the state’s most generous plans for these classes of employees.

Because of the plans’ cost to the state, they were closed to new hires in 1977 and replaced with less-generous plans. Most of their beneficiaries are retired. (An exception is outgoing Gov. Chris Gregoire.)

The rule for pensions is that benefits cannot be taken away from employees who have earned them. But the benefit at issue here is not the core pension, but an add-on based on years of service. The added benefit was created 18 years after the plans were closed to new members, so no one joined the state expecting it.

The law creating the benefit in 1995 said it could be taken away, and in 2011, legislators voted to do so. Retirees could keep receiving all the raises granted under it but would be granted no new ones.

That put these Plan 1 members on the same footing as members of typical private plans, which have no cost-of-living or other escalators. The state’s Plan 2 and Plan 3 pensions, which are less generous than the Plan 1 pensions overall, have cost-of-living adjustments capped at 3 percent a year.

In his ruling, Judge Chris Wickham said the Legislature cannot offer a pension benefit and reserve the right to take it back. He allowed, however, that the Washington Supreme Court might disagree with him, and distinguish pension add-ons “from the core retirement rights” of pensions.

A disagreement is in order.

 Subscribe today!

Subscribe today!

99¢ for four weeks of unlimited digital access.



NDN Video

The Seattle Times Historical Archives

Browse our newspaper page archives from 1900-1984