Skip to main content

Originally published December 14, 2013 at 4:04 PM | Page modified December 16, 2013 at 11:32 AM

  • Share:
  • Comments (24)
  • Print

Corrected version

Editorial: A charter schools victory in court

A King County Superior Court rejects nearly every constitutional challenge to charter schools.

Seattle Times Editorial

Most Popular Comments
Hide / Show comments
The judge ruled that any charter schools created under this law would not be common... MORE
Its obvious the WEA is scared about having some competition that might do a better job... MORE
Did your editorial board even read the trial court decision? I think not. On the... MORE


KING County Superior Court Judge Jean Rietschel relied on legal precedent and a smart reading of education policy to reject nearly all of the constitutional challenges to Initiative 1240, the charter schools law passed by voters in November.

Rietschel’s opinion, released last week, apparently confused charter school opponents, who immediately announced the new schools had been declared unconstitutional.

State Attorney General Bob Ferguson quickly cleared up the misunderstanding with a succinct summary of the ruling: “The court has held the vast majority of the charter schools initiative constitutional, and the state will continue to implement this law.”

Rietschel did strike down a limited aspect of the charter school law. The judge found it unconstitutional to designate a charter school as a “common school,” meaning charters may not be eligible for money from the state’s school construction fund.

That will have little to no immediate impact. The majority of applications to open a charter school in 2014 and thereafter propose leasing space in existing schools or community facilities. The state matching fund is only for major school remodels or new construction.

The judge’s ruling rightly does not stop charters from receiving the same per-pupil funding for operating costs as traditional public schools.

The teacher’s union, the Washington Education Association, is leading the coalition fighting the initiative, which allows for up to 40 schools over five years. Now the plaintiffs are threatening to turn to the state Supreme Court.

For now, state law and public money for operating costs remain firmly behind charter schools.

Information in this article, originally published Dec. 14, 2013, was corrected Dec. 16, 2013. A previous headline on this story incorrectly stated the charter schools victory was in the state Supreme Court. It was in King County Superior Court.

Relive the magic

Relive the magic

Shop for unique souvenirs highlighting great sports moments in Seattle history.



The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►