Northwest Voices | Letters to the Editor
Exposing Referendum 71 signers
Posted by Letters editor
Bruised messages could hurt
In his letter [“The ‘gay agenda,’ ” Northwest Voices, April 30], Howard Hance wrote, “We should take a small step toward [safety from harassment] by exposing the harassers who signed Referendum 71.” Respectfully, I could not disagree more. The motive behind making the names public is not transparency, but anger.
I did not sign the petition. I have followed this story closely because of my friends with domestic partners. It concerns me that exposing the names of the signers would tragically backfire because it begins with a mistaken assumption.
No one could know the intentions of every petition signer. The referendum itself caused enough confusion that a number of people signed it without really understanding why the rights and responsibilities of domestic partners were being put to a vote.
To assume that all signers of a petition have a single-minded and negative intention and should therefore be exposed for their prejudices is no better than the gross and unfair generalization that domestic partners are somehow unworthy of equal rights under the law. Please, do not turn the right to love and be loved into a message of intolerance. It is the wrong way to stand up to this issue. People would be hurt by it.
— Teresa Mosteller, Seattle
Feb 21 - 7:00 AM Sen. Patty Murray plans to reintroduce Wild Olympics bill
Feb 21 - 7:00 AM Gun bill allows for police inspection
Feb 21 - 7:00 AM President Obama's early childhood education expansion proposal
Feb 21 - 7:00 AM Don't restrict public's right to access information
Feb 20 - 4:00 PM Lake Burien: public, but private