Northwest Voices | Letters to the Editor
Elena Kagan for Supreme Court
Posted by Letters editor
Making history, breaking ground
President Obama announced his choice of Solicitor General Elena Kagan to replace 90-year-old Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, who announced his plan to retire later this year. [“Kagen would be vehicle for change,” page one, May 11.]
All the current Supreme Court justices have served as a federal judge before being nominated to the nation’s highest court. Kagan has not served in that capacity, nor has she been a judge at all.
It seems the president is more interested in placing someone on the bench who thinks like he does as opposed to someone willing to apply the law when making judicial decisions, which would affect millions of American citizens for generations.
While Kagan may have an impressive résumé and doubtlessly has an astute, legal mind, still, it is not known what her judicial philosophy is or how impartial she could be.
— Robert Randle, Tacoma
Kagen elite, not ordinary
What could Supreme Court Nominee Elena Kagan possibly know about ordinary people? She was educated at an elite high school, an elite college, an elite law school and Oxford University, with two federal court clerkships and teaching posts at elite law schools.
The rest of her work life was spent in elite jobs in Washington, D.C. She has no reason to know anything about ordinary people — unless of course, when President Obama says ordinary, he means those with a career path like Kagan’s, which is far from ordinary.
— Michael Bond, Seattle
Feb 21 - 7:00 AM Sen. Patty Murray plans to reintroduce Wild Olympics bill
Feb 21 - 7:00 AM Gun bill allows for police inspection
Feb 21 - 7:00 AM President Obama's early childhood education expansion proposal
Feb 21 - 7:00 AM Don't restrict public's right to access information
Feb 20 - 4:00 PM Lake Burien: public, but private