Skip to main content
Advertising

Northwest Voices | Letters to the Editor

Welcome to The Seattle Times' online letters to the editor, a sampling of readers' opinions. Join the conversation by commenting on these letters or send your own letter of up to 200 words letters@seattletimes.com.

November 9, 2012 at 7:00 AM

  • Share:
             
  • Comments ((0))
  • Print

Washington voters sending mixed messages

Difficult understanding of trade-offs

The Seattle Times editorial board pointed out the irony that Washington voters elected a Democratic majority to the Legislature who favor spending on health care andsocial programs, yet approved a two-thirds requirement for raising taxes [“…Unless they know what they’re getting,” Editorials, Nov. 8].

But this is not a surprise. Who doesn't want health care, education and social programs and lower taxes? The problem is that when voters check the box for a tax-limiting initiative, they are not shown the trade-offs on their ballot. With the state facing a $1 billion deficit, which programs should be cut — health care for poor children, prisons, higher education?

A progressive new revenue measure, like a capital-gains tax, would go a long way toward helping our state pay for the services we expect, while not burdening middle-class families. But enacting such a measure is much more difficult in the Tim Eyman era.

— Melanie Mayock, Seattle


Comments
No comments have been posted to this article.

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

 Subscribe today!

Subscribe today!

99¢ for four weeks of unlimited digital access.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising



Advertising