Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

Editorials / Opinion


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published Monday, July 5, 2010 at 4:01 PM

Comments (0)     E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

Guest columnist

Obama administration kicking construction when it's down

The Obama administration is implementing a new rule that would deny 85 percent of the nation's construction work force — those who do not belong to a union — the opportunity to work on federal projects paid for by taxpayers, writes guest columnist Jim Elmer.

Special to The Times

THE construction industry is bleeding.

Nearly a quarter of the nation's construction workers are unemployed and contractors are facing a series of government mandates and proposals that will only serve to kick the industry while it's already down.

At the heart of the hemorrhaging is the fact that the current administration seems to feel a need to pay back Big Labor bosses for their political support from previous elections at the expense of quality nonunion contractors and their skilled employees. One example is the recent final rule implementing President Obama's Executive Order 13502, which strongly encourages federal agencies to require project labor agreements (PLAs) on select federal construction projects costing more than $25 million. This new rule is special-interest politics at its worst and will result in taxpayers paying more and getting less.

To put it in simpler terms, a PLA would deny 85 percent of the construction work force — those who do not belong to a union — the opportunity to work on federal construction projects funded by tax dollars, even when their own tax money is being used to pay for the project.

PLAs mandate that all hiring for these projects be executed through union halls, that all employees pay union dues and adhere to inefficient union work rules, and that contractors must pay into union benefit and pension programs — which their nonunion employees will never benefit from unless they join the local union.

PLAs further hurt taxpayers as they cause project costs to increase up to 20 percent when compared with similar projects that are not subject to these costly union-favoring agreements. In short, with PLAs, the public is building four schools for the price of five.

At the same time, the Obama administration's Middle Class Taskforce is considering a "high road" contracting policy that favors unionized companies bidding on federal projects. Under this policy, the government would rate each contractor according to a set of factors that are based on subjective criteria suggested by Big Labor's special-interest groups and think tanks. The practical effect of this policy will likely keep nonunion contractors from competing for federal contracts and creating jobs even if those same contractors have long-established positive working relationships with the government.

Another gift to Big Labor is President Obama's Easter congressional-recess appointment of labor union lawyer Craig Becker to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), despite bipartisan Senate opposition. Becker has written in support of forcing workers to unionize and has advocated for the most radical theories of labor law far outside the mainstream — including severely restricting the free speech rights of employers.

As a member of the NLRB, Becker could muster support from fellow Democratic appointees to rewrite federal labor laws through litigation. In theory, Becker could change current law through the adjudication of specific cases before the board and establish key provisions of the misnamed Employee Free Choice Act.

The Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) would strip a worker's fundamental American right to a federally supervised secret-ballot election when deciding whether to join a labor union and replace it with a "card check" system. This would leave the worker vulnerable to coercion and harassment by union officials. EFCA could also force workers and businesses into binding wage and benefit contracts. These contracts would be set by a government bureaucrat with no required knowledge of the industry and would be binding for two years. Studies have shown that if EFCA became law, 600,000 jobs would be lost in the first year alone.

All of these union paybacks add up to one thing: The construction industry will continue to bleed as these special-interest government mandates and proposals are implemented. The nation's construction industry should not be allowed to fail because of the government's penchant for favoring one group over another. The stakes are just too high.

Jim Elmer is the 2010 national chairman of the Associated Builders and Contractors and the president of James W. Elmer Construction Co. in Spokane, Wash.

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

More Opinion

NEW - 5:04 PM
A Florida U.S. Senate candidate and crimes against writing

NEW - 5:05 PM
Guest columnist: Washington Legislature is closing budget gap with student debt

Guest columnist: Seattle Public Schools must do more than replace the chief

Leonard Pitts Jr. / Syndicated columnist: The peril of lower standards in the 'new journalism'

Neal Peirce / Syndicated columnist: How do states afford needed investment and budget cuts?

More Opinion headlines...

Comments
No comments have been posted to this article.


Get home delivery today!

Video

Advertising

AP Video

Entertainment | Top Video | World | Offbeat Video | Sci-Tech

Marketplace

Advertising