Skip to main content

Originally published August 28, 2014 at 5:12 PM | Page modified August 29, 2014 at 11:39 AM

  • Share:
  • Comments
  • Print

Guest: James Foley, Ferguson and threats to press freedom

The complexities of exercising freedom of the speech are now center stage with attempts to intimidate and silence journalists in Ferguson, Mo., Egypt and Iraq, writes guest columnist David A. Steinberg.

Special to The Times

Reader Comments
Hide / Show comments
@Mel Lemon You really don't get what the concept of "freedom of speech" means, do you? The Times is under no obligation... MORE
They are free to be biased. Remember, the press is bought and owned; nothing is free. MORE
I phrased that wrongly. What I mean to say was, Too bad you can't say the same about American "journalists"; I hear... MORE


FREEDOM of speech. It’s a deceptively simple phrase. And while governments and local authorities have sought to curb this freedom long before it was enshrined in our Constitution, the complexities of exercising this right are now center stage.

The absurd trial of Al-Jazeera journalists in Egypt and the gruesome beheading of U.S. journalist James Foley by the Islamic State (ISIS) are perhaps the most obvious attempts to intimidate and silence those who are working to get vital news out to the rest of the world.

But we don’t need to go as far as the Middle East — or restrictive countries like Russia or China — to find instances of the powerful trying to control the voices of the disenfranchised. In a town that could be “Anywhere, USA,” Ferguson, Mo., is serving as a microcosm in the conflict between a government’s need to maintain order and the public’s right to know.

Two reporters were arrested for not leaving a McDonald’s restaurant as quickly as police demanded. A TV crew was hit with tear gas and after it fled, authorities tampered with its equipment. Journalists have been ordered to stop filming police, in clear violation of the First Amendment. In all, about a dozen and a half journalists have been arrested or detained in Ferguson for no other reason than gathering information in a place that law enforcement didn’t want them to be.

If this sounds familiar, it should. Seattle experienced similar instances in the recent past, a glaring example being coverage of the riots at the 1999 World Trade Organization meeting.

As the situation in Ferguson illustrates, the need for informed and sensitive coverage is increasingly important, and it is impossible to meet that need when journalists trying to report the story are harassed and arrested.

But this isn’t just about Ferguson or Michael Brown, the African-American teen whose shooting death sparked riots there. It’s not just a racial issue that can be reduced to a storyline about black victims and white cops. Nor is it limited to the First Amendment rights of journalists whose job it is to give voice to those who have none.

When it comes to diversity issues, there are tinder boxes everywhere, because such situations tap into some of the most difficult issues of race, immigration and ethnicity. The better job we as news professionals do in raising awareness about and through our coverage, the better informed people will be.

The journalists covering the Ferguson story come from newsrooms that are far more diverse than 50 years ago, when the Civil Rights Act was enacted. That diversity, combined with the watchful eye of people on social media, can be credited with improving coverage. These diverse perspectives give the public a fuller picture of the details and context of who, what, where, when, how and why events like the Ferguson protests are important.

Here’s to hoping that the diverse corps of journalists covering Ferguson and beyond can tell the story with impunity and without restrictions.

David A. Steinberg of Oakland is president of UNITY: Journalists for Diversity, a coalition of the Asian American Journalists Association, the National Lesbian & Gay Journalists Association and the Native American Journalists Association.

Four weeks for 99 cents of unlimited digital access to The Seattle Times. Try it now!

 Subscribe today!

Subscribe today!

99¢ for four weeks of unlimited digital access.



The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►
The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription upgrade.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. For unlimited access, please upgrade your digital subscription.

Call customer service at 1.800.542.0820 for assistance with your upgrade or questions about your subscriber status.

The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. Subscribe now for unlimited access!

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited content access is included with most subscriptions.

Activate Subscriber Account ►