Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

Local News


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Go to the politics section for more local and national politics coverage.

Politics Northwest

The Seattle Times political team explores national, state and local politics.

January 19, 2011 at 5:14 PM

Comments (0)     E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

Bill would place new requirements on ballot-initiative process

Posted by Joanna Nolasco

State Sen. Sharon Nelson, D-West Seattle, is sponsoring a bill this session that would place new requirements on the ballot-initiative process aimed at reducing the chances of fraud in paid signature-gathering.

Some highlights of the Senate Bill 5297 include:

  • Paid signature gatherers would need to register with the Secretary of State; failure to register would incur a fine.
  • Those convicted of fraud, forgery or ID theft would be prohibited from gathering signatures in Washington for five years.
  • The initiative filing fee would increase from the current $5 to $500, with a $450 refund if the measure qualifies for the ballot. The $500 fee would be waived if the initiative was filed with 1,000 valid signatures.
  • The affidavit on the back of petitions must be signed by the signature gatherer, attesting that the signatures were collected in accordance with state law. If not, the initiative sponsor would have to pay the cost of checking the validity of every signature.

"Because paid signature gatherers are paid by volume, it provides incentive for abuse," said Kristina Logsdon, project director for the Ballot Initiative Network, a coalition that backs the bill. … This legislation is about bringing basic transparency and accountability processes to our system in Washington state so we can ensure that our process has integrity."

Initiative activist Tim Eyman, however, questioned the constitutionality of the bill, calling it “one, big smorgasbord of anti-initiative legislation.”

“We will be there in force at any hearing that they have,” he said. “The huge threshold for collecting signatures and the requirement that [initiatives] can only pass with the vote of the people … are high enough hurdles that have done an extraordinary job of … making our initiative process a very difficult process already.

"For them to put even additional hurdles in front of it seems to me obviously contrary to what the constitution says,” Eyman said.

A number of bills introduced in last year's legislative session proposed similar changes to the initiative process.

For example, a bill sponsored by former Sen. Joe McDermott, D-West Seattle, would have required paid signature gatherers to register with the state's Public Disclosure Commission. The bill passed through the Senate but failed to reach a vote on the House floor.

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

Comments
No comments have been posted to this article.

Recent entries

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Browse the archives

January 2011

December 2010

November 2010

October 2010

September 2010

August 2010

Contributors

Jim Brunner
Covers politics.

Keith Ervin
Covers the Eastside.

Andrew Garber
Covers politics and state government from Olympia.

Emily Heffter
Covers local government.

Mike Lindblom
Covers transportation.

Kyung Song
Covers politics and regional issues from Washington, D.C.

Lynn Thompson
Covers Seattle City Hall.

Bob Young
Covers King County and urban affairs.