Advertising

Go to the politics section for more local and national politics coverage.

Politics Northwest

The Seattle Times political team explores national, state and local politics.

October 20, 2011 at 2:29 PM

National distillers association criticizes I-1183 provisions

Posted by Melissa Allison

The national association of spirits manufacturers has come out against parts of Initiative 1183, a measure backed by Costco Wholesale that would privatize liquor and deregulate wine distribution in Washington.

The Distilled Spirits Council of the United States, which represents 13 large makers of liquor and 50 craft distilleries, says in new ads and on a website that the measure would raise prices, reduce selection and hurt small businesses by imposing a 10,000-square-foot minimum for stores selling liquor.

Interestingly, the No on I-1183 campaign has argued that the measure has a loophole that would allow nearly 1,000 mini marts and gas stations to sell liquor. There is considerable doubt about whether that’s true, but if it were, the Distilled Spirits Council appears to consider it a pro-small business opportunity.

The council also says I-1183 would decrease competition, which is a tricky argument to make in a state that has a single distributor and retailer of spirits -- the state itself. The group seems to mean that the measure would create a state with less competition than some other states and less than another privatization effort might yield -- again, if there were no 10,000-square-foot rule.

The group also dislikes that I-1183 would allow restaurants to buy limited quantities of liquor from retailers. It says that would add middlemen -- the retailer -- which is not in customers’ best interests.

Perhaps the most interesting point made by the council is one that has not gotten much attention in the initaitive campaign: I-1183 would make it difficult for liquor manufacturers to switch distributors if they became unhappy with their services, said Distilled Spirits Council senior vice president and spokesman Frank Coleman.

It’s a concept called franchise protection, which the council opposes nationally, just as it opposes competitive limitations like the 10,000-square-foot minimum in I-1183.

The group announced its critique the day after news that Costco has contributed twice as much money as its opposition in the corporate battle over the initiative.

Despite the ads and new website, Coleman insists the council remains neutral on I-1183.

“We get to be what we want to be, and we are completely neutral on privatization and 1183, but there are principles on a national level that we have always opposed,” Coleman said.

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

"Here's a sunny thought though, our Governor still has line item veto power, and she's against the proposal. Let's hope that...  Posted on October 22, 2011 at 2:04 PM by peppermint_patty. Jump to comment
@Keith Barnes ~ The markup numbers OFM used are from the IRS and DISCUS. I've heard they're not accurate for craft distilleries selling...  Posted on October 21, 2011 at 5:59 PM by Melissa Allison. Jump to comment
Melissa, I apologize for calling you Allison. No disrespect meant.  Posted on October 21, 2011 at 5:56 PM by Keith Barnes. Jump to comment

Recent entries

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Browse the archives

October 2011

September 2011

August 2011

July 2011

June 2011

May 2011

Contributors

Jim Brunner
Covers politics.

Keith Ervin
Covers the Eastside.

Andrew Garber
Covers politics and state government from Olympia.

Emily Heffter
Covers local government.

Mike Lindblom
Covers transportation.

Kyung Song
Covers politics and regional issues from Washington, D.C.

Lynn Thompson
Covers Seattle City Hall.

Bob Young
Covers King County and urban affairs.